“God with us” a different kind of King
Now the birth of Jesus Christ was as follows: After His mother Mary was betrothed to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Spirit. Then Joseph her husband, being a just man, and not wanting to make her a public example, was minded to put her away secretly. But while he thought about these things, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying, “Joseph, son of David, do not be afraid to take to you Mary your wife, for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Spirit. And she will bring forth a Son, and you shall call His name Jesus, for He will save His people from their sins.”
So all this was done that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the Lord through the prophet, saying: “Behold, the virgin shall be with child, and bear a Son, and they shall call His name Immanuel,” which is translated, “God with us.”
Then Joseph, being aroused from sleep, did as the angel of the Lord commanded him and took to him his wife, and did not know her till she had brought forth her firstborn Son. And he called His name Jesus.
Matthew 1:18-25 NKJV
In order to contextualize our passage we need to connect it with what we have earlier in Matthew’s Gospel. Matthew opens with a genealogy of Joseph, the betrothed (or engaged) of Mary. Matthew’s focal point is to show his readers that Jesus Christ is the true heir and King of Israel. Matthew’s gospel opens: “The book of the genealogy of Jesus Christ, the Son of David, the Son of Abraham” (Matthew 1: 1). What is clear from our text is Matthew is connecting Jesus Christ with Abraham the father of all Jews and then with the Davidic royal lineage of the King of Israel.
We ask the question why tell us Joseph’s lineage if Joseph is not really Jesus’s biological father and if Jesus is born of the Virgin Mary?
Tradition tells us that Mary didn’t have any brothers, which would mean there were no male heirs to inherit her father’s possessions and rights. Thus according to Mosaic Law in Numbers 27 & 36, when there are no male heirs a daughter inherits her father’s possessions and rights if she marries within her own tribe. This is what we have here with Joseph. Her marriage to Joseph (who is of the same tribe) would insure that the inheritance of her father was passed on. This would make Jesus the full inheritor of the right to rule on David’s throne. Thus, just like in Luke’s account, Matthew’s genealogy had to be established by the Law of Moses in order to lay the claim of Christ’s right to rule on David’s throne. Taking that genealogy into account as well as our text, along with what immediately follows our passage in Matthew 2 the where the Magi come to Herod seeking “the one who has been born King of the Jews” we have the full picture of the Heavenly born King.
Matthew’s Gospel from the beginning is doing these three things; first establishing the legality and legitimacy of Jesus Christ as the heir and rightful King of Israel, secondly that He is born miraculously of God, and third, juxtaposing king Herod as a Jewish usurper. If you can see it, what Matthew is telling us is political dynamite! By establishing that Jesus is the true King of Israel, of the royal line of David, Matthew by default is saying Herod is a false King and an impostor! Matthew is being highly subversive in setting the two Kings and Kingdoms in contradistinction to each other (Luke by the way does the same in his account where Jesus is set up in contradistinction to the world Emperor Caesar). This juxtaposition is important in that Jesus Christ is presented as “Immanuel” the God/Man, the true Heavenly King who has come down from heaven to be “God with us”. Matthew is also telling us Jesus Christ is a different kind of a King, one who enters our world miraculously through the womb of the Blessed Virgin. God Himself to become one of us, and to live among us.
Not only in our text but throughout Matthew’s gospel Jesus is revealed as a different kind of King, a servant King who is the opposite of earthly rulers who, more often than not were tyrants, leaders who were “out of touch” with the simple people. Often they lived protected from the masses, living it up in fortress like palaces, ruling with an iron fist, shielded from the very people they ruled.
Ancient kingdoms like any human government in human history were “top down”. So much so that kings and rulers were literally viewed as gods and to be served as such. It is well known that Pharaoh, Alexander, Caesar, and other ancient rulers were considered gods in the ancient world. Imperial “emperor cults” held monarchs out as divine to their subjects. Emperors served as both head of state and as a deity or sovereign religious figure. Theirs was a system of government that combined theocracy with absolute monarchy. Coinage as well also often reinforced the emperor’s divinity. One historian and theologian said this about the Roman coinage: “the coins of Tiberius carried a “bust of Tiberius in Olympian nakedness, adorned with the laurel wreath, the sign of divinity.” The inscription read, “Emperor Tiberius August Son of the August God,” on the one side, and “Pontifex Maximus” or “High Priest” on the other. The symbols also included the emperor’s mother, Julia Augusta (Livia) sitting on the throne of the gods, holding the Olympian sceptre in her right hand, and, in her left, the olive branch to signify that “she was the earthly incarnation of the heavenly Pax.” Tiberius’s own father Augustus had this phrase on his coinage: “salvation is to be found in none other save Augustus, and there is no other name given to men in which they can be saved” which the Apostle Peter uses in the book of Acts (4:12) of Christ’s present reign! Not much has changed; in modern times we too have seen governments that require “total allegiance” or “religious like” allegiance to the state. Men like Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and others have had messianic aspirations (as political saviors) whom require god like allegiance to the state (of which they embodied) as if the state and its ideals were “god incarnate”.
Thus in the Gospel we have the exact opposite of this type of top down god like Kingdom. Instead of man reaching by force to become “a god” among men, we have the true God and Heavenly King condescending from His Heavenly Majesty to become a lowly and humble servant as a man. Jesus Christ, the servant King for mankind who was born to be the world’s Savior and Israel’s long expected Messiah. A God/King that became vulnerable like us by entering into our experience in the humblest of circumstances, in a world filled with evil and violence, to fully experience with us what it means to be human. He became like us (Heb 2:17) and by His example showed how to love God, as well as a new way of being human, by a new way of living a life of love, peace, self-sacrifice, and service to our fellow man.
Napoleon Bonaparte contrasts earthly rule to Christ’s and said this of Jesus: “I know men; and I tell you that Jesus Christ is no mere man. Between Him and every person in the world there is no possible term of comparison. Alexander, Caesar, Charlemagne, and I have founded empires. But on what did we rest the creations of our genius? Upon force. Jesus Christ founded His empire upon love; and at this hour millions of men would die for him.”
Thus, throughout the Gospels we have the stories of the confrontation of these two ways of life. One where the meek and humble inherit the earth, where the merciful are exalted, where peacemakers are called the children of God, and where rather than hating your enemies all are called to love their enemies. Throughout Matthew’s Gospel there is the clashing of these two worldviews, a clash of two sets of opposing values, where eventually this clash would lead right up to the cross were Jesus once again is confronting head-on the representatives of Herod and Caesar Augustus. That head on confrontation eventually lead to Christ’s Crucifixion, Resurrection, and Ascension which sealed Christ’s victory over them and powers that be; “For if the rulers of this world understood it they would not have crucified the Lord of glory” (1 Cor 2:8). Thus by Christ’s Ascension to be seated at the Right Hand of the Father, far above all principality and power, Jesus Christ is enthroned as King of Kings and Lord of Lord’s and everyone else from Caesar downwards, all the way to the evil one himself, is dethroned. Thus as we said in week one of Advent; the world today is a totally different place from what it was in the first century. Its transformation is due in large measure to the teachings and finished work of our King worked out through His people in concrete history.
In Advent we have Jesus Christ, our God King, made flesh incarnate. We have the Heavenly King that turns the old world of “might makes right” upside down and on its head. Our King by His finished work brought an entirely new agenda for a new humanity of people that are transformed from the inside out, a renewed humanity by which He will reconcile and renew the world to God. For “God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself, not imputing their trespasses to them, and has committed to us the word of reconciliation” (1 Cor 5:19).
Thus, God’s Kingdom is worked out in history through the meek, the merciful, the pure of heart, and the peacemakers! God’s Kingdom is not like the world which sends in the armies to bring about change. Instead change comes as our King sends His simple followers, you and me, to preach the Good News of the Kingdom, and to do in humility and hope the world renewing works of the Kingdom. Simple everyday works of love and service to our fellow man through which the living God is implementing His rule and His Kingdom! As the old hymn says:
“Joy to the world! The Lord is come. Let earth receive her King!
Amen and Amen!
Larry Temple, Advent 2016
References used:
bibletools.org
wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_cult
Ethelbert Stauffer, Christ and the Caesars, 1955
R.J. Rushdoony, “The Tribute Money,” The Institutes of Biblical Law, 1973
Bishop Robert Barron on Christmas (youtube)
NT Wright: How God became King (youtube)